Press Conference Shows Bush in a State of Denial
What have you done to further peace, Mr.President?:
These words sound very noble. Nonetheless, you've done absolutely zip to further the peace process between the two sides. Instead you've given Israel the green light to destroy Hamas. At least your predecessors made an effort.
He could be talking about neocons:
Does this apply to your friends in Saudi Arabia?:
It certainly doesn't apply to Pakistan, on whom you depend to fight the war on terror.
Bush finally admits that a change in policy is necessary:
So why don't you adopt the proposals? Admit it: You have no intention of adopting any of the proposals in the report.
One reporter really gets it:
And a stupid response.
Either he likes the word prevail or he has a limited vocabulary. Is he trying to rhyme? He uses the words prevail and fail repeatedly:
So why don't you recognize the democratically elected government of the Palestinians:
You are contradicting yourself, Mr.President.
I guess this means no change in policy. Stay the course no matter what:
Source: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/12/20061207-1.html
[...]it is important that we do everything we can in the wider Middle East to bring about peace between Israel and the Palestinians. This is something that I know you feel deeply and passionately about; you are the first President who committed yourself to the two state solution. And I believe that by moving this forward we send a very strong signal not just to the region, but to the whole of the world that we are evenhanded and just in the application of our values, that we want to see an Israel confident of its security and a Palestinian people able to live in peace and justice and democracy.
These words sound very noble. Nonetheless, you've done absolutely zip to further the peace process between the two sides. Instead you've given Israel the green light to destroy Hamas. At least your predecessors made an effort.
He could be talking about neocons:
[...]And they do so because they want to spread their ideologies -- their ideologies of hate -- and impose their rule on this vital part of the world. And should they succeed, history will look back on our time with unforgiving clarity and demand to know, what happened? How come free nations did not act to preserve the peace?
Does this apply to your friends in Saudi Arabia?:
But there are only two ways that the Middle East can go. Its people can either be presented with a choice between a secular or a religious dictatorship, which is not a choice that any free people would ever choose, or alternatively, they can enjoy the same possibilities of democracy that we hold dear in our countries. And this is not a view that we hold -- I hold because of idealism alone. It is because I also believe that the only realistic path to security is by ensuring the spread of liberty.
It certainly doesn't apply to Pakistan, on whom you depend to fight the war on terror.
Bush finally admits that a change in policy is necessary:
PRESIDENT BUSH: The thing I liked about the Baker-Hamilton report is it discussed the way forward in Iraq. And I believe we need a new approach. And that's why I've tasked the Pentagon to analyze the way forward.
So why don't you adopt the proposals? Admit it: You have no intention of adopting any of the proposals in the report.
One reporter really gets it:
Q Mr. President, the Iraq Study Group described the situation in Iraq as grave and deteriorating. You said that the increase in attacks is unsettling. That won't convince many people that you're still in denial about how bad things are in Iraq, and question your sincerity about changing course.
PRESIDENT BUSH: It's bad in Iraq. Does that help? (Laughter.)
And a stupid response.
Either he likes the word prevail or he has a limited vocabulary. Is he trying to rhyme? He uses the words prevail and fail repeatedly:
I also believe we're going to succeed. I believe we'll prevail. Not only do I know how important it is to prevail, I believe we will prevail. I understand how hard it is to prevail. But I also want the American people to understand that if we were to fail -- and one way to assure failure is just to quit, is not to adjust, and say it's just not worth it -- if we were to fail, that failed policy will come to hurt generations of Americans in the future.
So why don't you recognize the democratically elected government of the Palestinians:
Secondly, one of the reasons why there hasn't been instant success is because radicals and extremists are trying to stop the advance of a Palestinian state. Why? Because democracy is a defeat for them. That's what I strongly believe. I find it interesting that when Prime Minister Olmert reaches out to Palestinians to discuss a way forward on the two state solution, Hezbollah attacks Israel. Why? Because radicals and extremists can't stand the thought of a democracy. And one of the great ironies is that people in the Middle East are working hard to prevent people in the Middle East from realizing the blessings of a free society in their democracy.
You are contradicting yourself, Mr.President.
I guess this means no change in policy. Stay the course no matter what:
We'll continue after al Qaeda. Al Qaeda will not have safe haven in Iraq. And that's important for the American people to know. We've got special operators, we've got better intelligence. And al Qaeda is effective at these spectacular bombings, and we'll chase them down, and we are, along with the Iraqis. The strategy now is how to make sure that we've got the security situation in place such that the Iraqi government is capable of dealing with the sectarian violence, as well as the political and economic strategies, as well.
Source: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/12/20061207-1.html